Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Analyzing Primary Documents fromt the mid-19th century concerning debates between advocates of slavery and those desired to abolish it. | All Paper

BACKGROUNDAlthough the original Constitution of the United States did not mention the word “slavery” in its text, it recognized the existence and legality of this institution. It protected the rights of slaveholders with regard to the return of runaway slaves, by increasing representation for slaveholders through the three-fifths compromise, and the slave trade would be continued for twenty years (until 1808). As the United States developed so did the national debate over slavery. The belief that slavery would gradually disappear in the decades after the American Revolution decreased as cotton production increased, and the nation became more reliant on the textile industry. Westward expansion and the settlement of new lands only fueled the growing debate over slavery.By the 1830s, many southerners who had once defended slavery as a “necessary evil” now asserted that it was a “positive good.” An increasing number of abolitionists, on the other hand, came to believe that slavery was a grave sin and an evil institution that should be ended immediately. In his denunciations of slavery, William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death” and “an agreement with hell.” In response, southerners used their influence to pass a “gag rule” in Congress that prohibited anti-slavery petitions, restricted anti-slavery speech, and censored the US mail by prohibiting abolitionist literature from being sent to southern states. As both the abolitionists and the supporters of slavery became more entrenched in their positions, tempers flared, emotions heightened, and the fabric of the nation frayed into threats of secession and clouds of disunion.Did the agitation and activities of the abolitionists advance or defeat their objective? The “essential question” posed as the aim of this lesson presents students with an open-ended, thought-provoking historical issue for their analysis and assessment.ASSIGNMENTFor this assignment, the student will be analyzing primary documents from the mid-19th century concerning the debates between advocates of slavery and those that desired to abolish it. Below, the student will find the 8 excerpts from primary documents concerning these debates as well as four analysis questions.Keeping in mind the analysis questions, the student will prepare an essay that demonstrates critical thinking about the subject. Document A “I believe when two races come together which have different origins, colors, and physical and intellectual characteristics, that slavery is instead of an evil, a good – a positive good . . . There is and has always been, in an advanced state of wealth and civilization, a conflict between labor and capital. Slavery exempts Southern society from the disorders and dangers resulting from this conflict. This explains why the political condition of the slaveholding states has been so much more stable and quiet than that of the North.”—– John C. Calhoun, southern senator, February 6, 1837 Document B “The laboring classes enjoy more material comfort, are better fed, clothed and housed as slaves than as freemen. The statistics of crime demonstrate that the moral superiority of the slave over the free laborer is still greater . . . . There never can be among slaves a class so degraded as is found about the wharves and suburbs of cities. The master requires and enforces ordinary morality and industry. How slavery could degrade men lower than universal liberty has done, it is hard to conceive . . . . The free laborer rarely has a house and home of his own; he is insecure of employment . . . .”—– George Fitzhugh, author, Sociology for the South or the Failure of Free Society (1854) Document C“The slaves in the United States are treated with barbarous inhumanity; that they are overworked, underfed, wretchedly clad and lodged, and have insufficient sleep; . . . that they are frequently flogged with terrible severity; . . . their flesh branded with red hot irons; that they are maimed, mutilated and burned to death over slow fires. . . . We will establish all these facts by the testimony of scores and hundreds of eye witnesses. . . . We shall show, not merely that such deeds are committed, but that they are frequent . . . not in one of the slave states, but in all of them.”—– Theodore D. Weld, Slavery As It Is (1839) Document D“Slavery is sin before God. Individually, or as political communities, men have no more right to enact slavery, than they have to enact murder or blasphemy, or incest or adultery.”—– James G. Birney in 1835, Liberty Party presidential candidate Document E“We will do all . . . to overthrow the most execrable system of slavery that has ever been witnessed upon earth; to deliver our land from its deadliest curse; to wipe out the violent stain which rests upon our national escutcheon; and to secure to the colored population of the United States all the rights and privileges which belong to them as Americans – come what may to our persons, our interests, or our reputations, whether we live to witness the triumph of LIBERTY, JUSTICE, AND HUMANITY, or perish ultimately as martyrs in this great, benevolent and holy cause.”—– Declaration of the American Anti-Slavery Society (1834) Document F “How does it become a man to behave toward this American government to-day? I answer, that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it. I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slave’s government also . . . . if the law is of such a nature that it requires you to be an agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law . . . .”—– Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” (1849) Document G “I am determined at every hazard to lift up the standard of emancipation in the eyes of the nation . . . till every chain be broken and every bondman set free! Let southern oppressors tremble; let their secret abettors tremble; let their northern apologists tremble; let all the enemies of the persecuted blacks tremble. . . . I will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice. On this subject, I don’t wish to think, or speak, or write with moderation. No! No! Tell a man whose house is on fire to give a moderate alarm . . . but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. I am in earnest; I will not equivocate; I will not excuse; I will not retreat a single inch – AND I WILL BE HEARD.”—– William Lloyd Garrison, The Liberator, January 1, 1831 Document H “I tell you Americans! That unless you speedily alter your course, you and your country are gone!!!!!! For God Almighty will tear up the very face of the earth!!! . . . . But I am afraid that they have done us so much injury, and are so firm in their belief that our Creator made us to be an inheritance to them forever, that their hearts will be hardened so that their destruction may be sure. But O Americans! I warn you . . . to repent and reform, or you are ruined!!!—– David Walker’s Appeal in Four Articles with a Preamble to the Coloured Citizens of the World (1829)DOCUMENT ANALYSIS QUESTIONS (Make sure to address each one in your essay)1) Identify the authors who argue that slavery is a positive institution. What are their key arguments in defense of slavery? Which, if any, of these arguments have merit? Explain your position. Do not quote the documents but take their main idea and put it into your own words. 2) Identify the authors who reject slavery. Characterize their position as moderate, reasonable, militant or radical. Were their actions and words necessary or not for slavery to end? Explain and support your choices. Do not quote the documents but take their main idea and put it into your own words. 3) Do you agree or disagree with Henry David Thoreau’s position (Document F) on civil disobedience concerning slavery? Under what conditions do you think that civil disobedience is justified? Explain. Do not quote the documents but take their main idea and put it into your own words. 4) Should the radical abolitionists be blamed for the secession of the Southern states from theUnion and for the Civil War, or praised for bringing slavery to an end? Explain.HOW TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT YOUR ESSAYThe student’s essay is to be:
A single page in length (do not adjust margins) minimum with no headings.
12 point font and Times New Roman
Single spaced
The format of the essay is as follows:


A short paragraph that briefly describes to the reader what the essay will cover. (3-4 sentences)


1 paragraph that addresses the first analysis question and uses specific evidence from the documents to back up assertions and answers. (5-6 sentences)
1 paragraph that addresses the second analysis questions and uses specific evidence from the documents to back up assertions and answers. (7-8 sentences minimum. You will write the most on this paragraph since you are covering 6 documents)
1 paragraph that addresses the third analysis question and uses specific evidence from the documents to back up assertions and answers. (5-6 sentences)
1 paragraph that addresses the fourth question (4-6 sentences)


A short paragraph that briefly sums up your essay’s major arguments. (3-4 sentences)

error: Content is protected !!