Chat with us, powered by LiveChat NRS427VN Community Teaching Experience Approval Form PP Presentation | All Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best
approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation based on the Teaching
Work Plan and present the information to your community.
Options for Delivery Select one of the following options for delivery and prepare the
applicable presentation:PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes (15 slides)
Selection of Community SettingThese are considered appropriate community settings. Choose one of
the following:University/School health center (High School)
Community Teaching Experience Approval Form Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from
an agency administrator or representative using the “Community
Teaching Experience Approval Form.” Submit this form as directed
in the Community Teaching Experience Approval assignment drop box.
General RequirementsWhile APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources
should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
rubric_print_format_2_.xlsx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code
NRS-427VN
Class Code
NRS-427VN-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan
15.0%
Epidemiological Rationale for Topic
15.0%
Evaluation of Teaching Experience
20.0%
Community Response to Teaching Provided
15.0%
Areas of Strength and Improvement
15.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
5.0%
Paper Format
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
3.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Summary of community teaching plan is omitted.
Epidemiological rationale for the topic is omitted.
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.
Community response to teaching is omitted.
Areas of strength and improvement are omitted.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
100.0
Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. Overall,
the teaching plan is unclear.
Epidemiological rationale is unclear or incorrect.
Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear or
underdeveloped. The narrative is not written in a manner
that evaluates the experience.
Community response to teaching is partially summarized.
More information is needed.
Areas of strength and improvement are partially discussed.
Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is
not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (83.00%)
Summary of community teaching plan is offered, but some
elements are vague. Some rationale or evidence is needed for
clarity and support.
Epidemiological rationale is summarized and provides some
support for the topic. More information or evidence is
needed for support.
Evaluation of teaching experience is summarized. Some
aspects are vague. More detail is needed to fully illustrate an
assessment of the experience.
A summary of the community response to teaching is
presented. Some areas are unclear. More information is
needed for support or clarity.
Areas of strength and improvement are generally discussed.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (94.00%)
Community teaching plan is clear with a detailed summary of
each component. Minor rationale is needed for clarity or
support.
Epidemiological rationale is provided and provides general
support for the topic. Some detail is needed for clarity.
Evaluation of the teaching experience is generally presented.
Some detail is needed for clarity.
A description of community response to teaching is generally
presented. Some information is needed for support or clarity.
Areas of strength and improvement are discussed.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It
is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate
to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with
community teaching plan, detailed, and well supported. The
presentation demonstrates an ability to create effective
teaching plans relative to a population.
Strong epidemiological rationale is provided and
demonstrates support for the topic presented.
A comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience is
presented. Insight into self-appraisal in regard to teaching is
demonstrated.
A detailed description of community response to teaching is
presented.
Areas of strength and improvement are thoroughly discussed.
The author demonstrates insight into personal strengths and
areas where improvement would be beneficial.
Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the
essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of
the paper clear.
Comments
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Our essay writing service fulfills every request with the highest level of urgency.
attachment

error: Content is protected !!