Chat with us, powered by LiveChat NRS427VN Grand Canyon Week 5 Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal | All Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best
approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation based on the Teaching
Work Plan and present the information to your community.
Options for Delivery Select one of the following options for delivery and prepare the
applicable presentation:PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutesPamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pagesPoster
presentation
Selection of Community SettingThese are considered appropriate community settings. Choose one of
the following:Public health clinicCommunity health centerLong-term care facilityTransitional care facilityHome health centerUniversity/School health centerChurch communityAdult/Child care center
Community Teaching Experience Approval Form Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from
an agency administrator or representative using the “Community
Teaching Experience Approval Form.” Submit this form as directed
in the Community Teaching Experience Approval assignment drop box.
General RequirementsWhile APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources
should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
week_5_rubric.xlsx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code
NRS-427VN
Class Code
NRS-427VN-O506
Criteria
Content
Percentage
100.0%
Presentation Based on Teaching Work Plan and
Provider Feedback
20.0%
Presentation Provides Individualized Education
to Diverse Patient Population in Appropriate
Community Setting (C 3.3 Provide individualized
education to diverse patient populations in a
variety of health care settings.)
20.0%
Presentation of Content
40.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Presentation is not based on a Teaching Work Plan.
Presentation does not include individualized education to a
diverse patient population in an appropriate community
setting.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
120.0
Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)
Presentation partially based on a Teaching Work Plan.
Documented provider feedback is not integrated. Major
aspects are incomplete. More information is needed.
Presentation is incomplete. Significant information for the
identified population is omitted or unclear. Some diverse
attributes for that population are presented; not all attributes
are relevant to the population. The presentation does not
seem appropriate for the health care setting. There are major
inaccuracies. More information is needed.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some
persuasive information.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Presentation is generally based on Teaching Work Plan and
any documented provider feedback. Some aspects are
unclear. There are minor inconsistencies with Teaching Work
Plan.
Presentation provides general information for the identified
population. Some diverse attributes for that population are
presented. Presentation is appropriate to the community
setting chosen. At least one health care setting where this
individual education plan could be used has been proposed.
There are some inaccuracies. Minor detail or rationale is
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization or in their
relationships to each other.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (89.00%)
Presentation is based on Teaching Work Plan and any
documented provider feedback. All aspects are generally
consistent with Teaching Work Plan.
Presentation provides information for the identified
population and includes many diverse attributes for that
population. Presentation is pertinent to the community
setting chosen. Some additional health care settings where
this individual education plan could be used are proposed.
Some detail is needed for clarity.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable
sources.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Presentation is based on Teaching Work Plan and any
documented provider feedback. All aspects are generally
consistent with Teaching Work Plan.
Presentation provides specific information that focuses on
the identified population and includes all diverse attributes
for that population. Presentation is highly relevant to the
community setting chosen. Additional health care settings
where this individual education plan could be used are
identified and highly relevant. The presentation demonstrates
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.
Comments
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment