Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Threat Vulnerability and Exploits Assessment Practices Paper | All Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Assignment: Threat, Vulnerability, and Exploits Assessment Practices There are multiple ways to bring threats and vulnerabilities to light. Common practices and lessons learned can help us explore for known or common threats, but how does an organization with a unique or highly unusual setup discover its vulnerabilities? Many organizations turn to ethical hackers. Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you: Describe common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and vulnerabilities.Critique the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities.Explain the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems.Give your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers.Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Describe techniques for identifying relevant threats, vulnerabilities, and exploits.Apply the concept to a hypothetical companyUse technology and information resources to research issues in IT risk management.Write clearly and concisely about topics related to IT risk management using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions Note: Assignment will be check for plagarism Click here to view the grading rubric. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 120 Assignment 3: Threat, Vulnerability, and Exploits Assessment Practices Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Describe common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and vulnerabilities. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely described common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and vulnerabilities. Partially described common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and vulnerabilities. Satisfactorily described common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and vulnerabilities. Thoroughly described common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and vulnerabilities. 2. Critiqued the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities. Partially critiqued the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities. Satisfactorily critiqued the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities. Thoroughly critiqued the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities. 3. Explain the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely explained the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems. Partially explained the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems. Satisfactorily explained the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems. Thoroughly explained the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems. 4. Give your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers. Partially gave your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers. Satisfactorily gave your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers. Thoroughly gave your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers. 5. 2 references Weight: 5% No references provided. Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
it_risk_assignment_2.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assignment: Threat, Vulnerability, and Exploits Assessment Practices
There are multiple ways to bring threats and vulnerabilities to light. Common practices and
lessons learned can help us explore for known or common threats, but how does an organization
with a unique or highly unusual setup discover its vulnerabilities? Many organizations turn to
ethical hackers.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
1. Describe common tools and techniques for identifying and analyzing threats and
vulnerabilities.
2. Critique the practice of offering rewards for discovering vulnerabilities.
3. Explain the risks of challenging individuals to exploit vulnerabilities in your systems.
4. Give your opinion on the formation of ethical hackers.
5. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar
Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:


Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins
on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check
with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the
professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are
not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:




Describe techniques for identifying relevant threats, vulnerabilities, and exploits.
Apply the concept to a hypothetical company
Use technology and information resources to research issues in IT risk management.
Write clearly and concisely about topics related to IT risk management using proper
writing mechanics and technical style conventions
Note: Assignment will be check for plagarism
Click here to view the grading rubric.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper,
and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 120
Assignment 3: Threat, Vulnerability, and Exploits Assessment
Practices
Unacceptable
Fair
Proficient
Exemplary
Criteria
Below 70% F
1. Describe common Did not submit
tools and techniques or incompletely
for identifying and
described
analyzing threats and common tools
vulnerabilities.
and techniques
for identifying
Weight: 20%
and analyzing
threats and
vulnerabilities.
70-79% C
Partially
described
common tools
and techniques
for identifying
and analyzing
threats and
vulnerabilities.
80-89% B
Satisfactorily
described
common tools
and techniques
for identifying
and analyzing
threats and
vulnerabilities.
90-100% A
Thoroughly
described
common tools
and techniques
for identifying
and analyzing
threats and
vulnerabilities.
2. Critiqued the
practice of offering
rewards for
discovering
vulnerabilities.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit
or incompletely
critiqued the
practice of
offering rewards
for discovering
vulnerabilities.
Partially
critiqued the
practice of
offering rewards
for discovering
vulnerabilities.
Satisfactorily
critiqued the
practice of
offering rewards
for discovering
vulnerabilities.
Thoroughly
critiqued the
practice of
offering rewards
for discovering
vulnerabilities.
3. Explain the risks
of challenging
individuals to exploit
vulnerabilities in
your systems.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit
or incompletely
explained the
risks of
challenging
individuals to
exploit
vulnerabilities
in your systems.
Partially
explained the
risks of
challenging
individuals to
exploit
vulnerabilities
in your systems.
Satisfactorily
explained the
risks of
challenging
individuals to
exploit
vulnerabilities
in your systems.
Thoroughly
explained the
risks of
challenging
individuals to
exploit
vulnerabilities
in your systems.
4. Give your opinion
on the formation of
ethical hackers.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit
or incompletely
gave your
opinion on the
formation of
ethical hackers.
Partially gave
your opinion on
the formation of
ethical hackers.
Satisfactorily
gave your
opinion on the
formation of
ethical hackers.
Thoroughly
gave your
opinion on the
formation of
ethical hackers.
5. 2 references
Weight: 5%
No references
provided.
Does not meet
the required
number of
Meets number
of required
references; all
Exceeds number
of required
references; all
6. Clarity, writing
mechanics, and
formatting
requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 6
errors present
references;
some or all
references poor
quality choices.
references high
quality choices.
references high
quality choices.
5-6 errors
present
3-4 errors
present
0-2 errors
present

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

error: Content is protected !!