Chat with us, powered by LiveChat WK9 Plan for A Process Evaluation and Key Program Elements Assignment | All Paper
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

APA Format and No Plagiarism 4- to 5-page plan for a process evaluation. Include the following minimal information:A description of the key program elementsA description of the strategies that the program uses to produce changeA description of the needs of the target populationAn explanation of why a process evaluation is important for the programA plan for building relationships with the staff and managementBroad questions to be answered by the process evaluationSpecific questions to be answered by the process evaluationA plan for gathering and analyzing the informationPlease use attached file No Plagrism and APA Format
noteswk9_2_.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1
Drafting a Process Evaluation
Most caregivers who are caring for elderly family members may experience some of the
same issues as the people they care for. A lot of caregivers provide care to family members
because of obligation and/or cultural beliefs. These beliefs keep them from soliciting help from
community agencies and familial support. As a result of solely providing care for the family
member, caregivers often neglect themselves. They do not realize the responsibility that comes
along with the job of caregiving. For example, they may not properly physically prepare
themselves to deal with the tedious demands of the job. Research shows that caregivers are
overwhelmed and overworked. They develop poor self-efficacy habits in taking care of their
minds and bodies. Furthermore, they continue to go at it alone and not reach out for the support
that is needed to be physically healthy and mentally happy in the profession.
Caregivers would benefit from a program that will offer strategies and impactful outcomes.
They need a support system that will offer resources, strategies, and techniques that are
personalized to fit their unique needs. An effective program will include trained professionals
that will be able to educate and provide effective best practices and/or research based
interventions. Additionally, the program will address the target population and offer funding that
is readily available for participants. The aforementioned components of the program will be
used to determine if the program is operational and is providing appropriate services that were
intended.
According to researcher Bartholomew (2015), process evaluations are used to monitor and
document program implementation. When implementing a process evaluation it is necessary to
have collaboration with a team of professionals that understand caregiving and all that it entails.
2
Initially, teams will meet and provide formal introductions. As a part of the team, members will
be briefed on their importance to the health of the program and their roles, as well as, how they
affect implementation. Each member of the team provide services that are well-planned and
research based. Stakeholders will be provided an agenda at each meeting, and receive a calendar
to document important meeting dates. Also, they will be provided anecdotal finding for each
session held with the caregivers. To address the emotional well-being of the caregiver they will
participate in 8 weeks of 90 minute therapy sessions. These sessions will help provide support
for caregivers. While attending therapy sessions, caregivers will visit with a clinician who will
evaluate their mental health challenges. Moreover, the clinicians will offer coping mechanisms
and provide an intervention plan that will assist with taking advantage of support systems and
dealing with their physical and mental health. Caregivers are recommended for program
evaluation by a medical professional or a medical facility of the family member. After the
initial referral for an evaluation, caregivers meet with the clinician. Each meeting will be unique
to the caregiver and his/her needs. Community organizations may also be present at the meeting
site to share details about the resources available. Agencies may include Meals on Wheel (food
delivery service), cleaning companies, and companion care agencies. Mental health counselors
will be on hand to provide support to those suffering from mental illness. Dietitians will
promote healthy eating habits by providing literature that address meal planning. Finally, selfcare counselors will teach strategies and techniques that will make caregiving appropriate and
effective for the caregiver and their families.
This process evaluations will determine if the caregiving program and interventions are
successful (Parcel, 2016). Components of the evaluation will address pertinent questions that
allow for understanding the caregiving program, how it was intended to work, defining the
3
program’s purpose, addressing the program’s characteristics and how it affects program
implementation, and making sure the program is researched based and well put together. To
address challenges and issues that may arise, it is imperative to know that caregivers are the
targeted population and eligibility for evaluation. Many of these issues will be addressed at the
initial meeting. Most process evaluations begin with addressing what services are being offered
and to whom. In this case, caregivers are receiving services to help deal with stressors related to
taking care of elderly family members. The staff will provide services that are outlined in the
program’s purpose to all clients regardless of their demographic background. Individuals
providing the care are knowledgeable and trained. To address all components of the program
process evaluations will also seek to obtain information about the perceptions of the program. In
addition, important factors of process evaluation determines when and how caregivers relate to
program and are they eligible to receive services. Evaluators will want to know the referral
process for the clients, who will be providing the services to clients, and if providers are
qualified to assist the clients.
During the process evaluation, it will address what happens during interventions with clients.
The evaluation will address program materials, services provided, communication methods,
organizations involved in the program, and intervention strategies and techniques. The process
evaluation will focus on addressing the level of care provided to the clients such information
about the group sessions and material being distributed. Evaluators will question the length and
frequency of the intervention. If there a program already active in the community, process
evaluations will seek to learn more information about how the program is run, and the
accessibility to the clients. If needed, clients with transportation issues will be given information
about public parking and/or public transportation.
4
When implementing a program, questions may be asked that address implementation
strategies, activities and financial concerns. These questions will set the foundation for future
participation and funding for the program. There are many broad questions to answer during
process evaluations. As an evaluator, knowing the strengths and weaknesses of the program’s
implementations will offer insight into the future success of the program. Additionally,
throughout implementation evaluators want to know the challenges at different points within the
program. One of the program’s goals were to understand the perceptions of the clients and the
staff. It would be necessary to find out those perceptions and how they impacted
implementation. The last question to address would probably deal with the effectiveness of
adequate funding and the financial support from community agencies.
In conclusion, to gather and analyze information after the evaluation and implementation,
providing an anonymous survey may elicit more honest feedback. For those having difficulty
with completing a survey, an open forum or discussion will be the best route for those
individuals. The survey will detail questions about implementation, benefits of the program, and
what did participants find to be most helpful.
5
References
Bartholomew, L. (2015). Intervention mapping: Designing theory and evidence-based health
promotion programs. New York: McGraw-Hill
Bliss, M. J., & Emshoff, J. G. (2002). Workbook for designing a process evaluation. Retrieved
from http://beta.roadsafetyevaluation.com/evaluationguides/info/workbook-fordesigning-a-process-evaluation.pdf
Parcel, L. (2002b). Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment